How Can We Stop Global Warming?


Strange Facts and Questions about Global Warming ACADEMIA and the CLIMATE EMERGENCY ITS THE LIFESTYLE, NOT THE SCIENCE Sceptics and Deniers Contact the Author, Michael Tuckson References and Acknowledgements Short CV For Beginners and the Bewildered COPENHAGEN and  AFTER BLOG WHAT YOU CAN DO NOW My Sitemap

An Independent, Global and Flexible Approach: This site has no national, political or scientific sub-theory bias. It is regularly Updated and Improved.



Dr. Michael Tuckson

Although emissions have been rising fairly steadily over the last century, especially since 1950, the averaged global temperature rise that has been taking place since about 1910, with a dip from about 1944 to 1980 and a rough leveling off in the 2000s, is not as steady a rise. The natural and human causes are not yet fully understood in detail in this highly complex surface earth system involving the interests of what are normally at least seven natural science disciplines. Technologies change; rising populations cut and often burn the remaining forests; farmers by their billions are trying new and old techniques, new nations enter the material scramble, while the clouds remain a partial enigma, ‘land-based’ processes present untold complexities to unravel, while seemingly most importantly the oceans gradually reveal their deep secrets. The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation is just beginning to be understood, while Southern Pacific Ocean presents us with its inscrutable siblings El Nino (warm) and La Nina (cool) oscillations, (or collectively ENSO),and the newly discovered Pacific Decadal Cycles and Interdecadal Pacific Oscillations in the northern Pacific challenge us further. The correlation between global emissions and global temperature can be seen, but in detail over the last hundred years it is not tidy. These fairly late discoveries and understandings in surface earth systems have been used by the extreme sceptics and deniers to distort the nature of contemporary theory.



This uncertanty is one reason why an increasing amount of research is being conducted on palaeo-climates as they 'integrate' the causes and effects, without human influence, over longer time periods, dampening out the small irregularities to show us the main patterns, although hardly revealing every environmental change at the time. As has been known for a century and a half, the earth has experienced many periods and locations of widespread glaciation that left behind a strange range of rocks and sediments, lying between average periods, and warm periods with high sea levels in which limestone was widely deposited. Using air trapped in ice bubbles and various elemental and isotope ratios in calcareous fossils as well as some calcareous deposits, the temperature and the carbon dioxide content of the past oceans and atmospheres can be estimated in detail. Numerous studies have shown that over many millions of years the two variables are well correlated, again and again, in all strata studied, not in every detail but sufficiently closely for us to be extremely concerned about the present rise in carbon dioxide.



In Earth history, when carbon dioxide concentrations are high the temperature was high and vice versa. Carbon dioxide has risen to as much as 2000 ppm while temperatures rose up to 6 degrees above the present temperature in the Eocene Epoch about 50 million years ago and several times before that. Moreover, sea level has risen and fallen in parallel with these oscillations as well as for reasons controlled by solid earth or crustal movement, including the formation and discharge of large lakes, probably polar movement and changes in the solid volume of ocean basins. When, in the relative short-term that we are facing today, these solid earth changes are essentially constant in most locations, it is temperature that determines most of the sea level. The exceptions are earth movement caused by the off-loading of the land glaciers themselves, notably in North America, some areas of an imbalance of sedimentation, erosion and subsidence and human induced subsidence. At temperatures and carbon dioxide concentrations similar to the present day, sea level has tended to be tens of metres higher than today. It has risen at times by as much as 4 cm per year, more than ten times the present rate.


So the correlations between carbon dioxide, temperature and sea level is significant but which way if any did the cause occur. We know from GHG physical theory that carbon dioxide causes warming, but we also know from biology and chemistry that warming emits carbon dioxide to the atmosphere from water and organic sources. Clearly warming causes water to expand and ice to melt.


In the oscillations in the Pleistocene epoch over the last 1.8 million years that we can study in more than usual detail, the initial temperature rise takes place before the carbon dioxide rise and can be shown to be largely due to changes in the geometry of the sun-earth relationship. We have no other explanation for the Pleistocene periodicity. The carbon dioxide by itself could not rise and fall with such a periodicity. Moreover, the changes in sun-earth geometry cannot explain the 3-5 degree range between coldest and warmest phases. As the temperature rises, feedback, firstly in water vapour, then carbon dioxide and then methane, takes over to create greater change. For example, the oceans evaporate faster to form water vapour and clouds that mainly warm the earth, and the forests deteriorate to give off carbon dioxide that warms it still further.


In much of pre-human times major additions to the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was provided by volcanic activity on land or beneath the sea, sometimes by giant round volcanoes with craters many tens of kilometers across or by long cracks in the crust. The carbon was taken away again into the solid earth more gradually over millions of years by the formation, subsidence and often the subduction (sea floor sliding beneath continents), of limestone, coal and oil strata, only to eventually be reemitted in new phases of volcanism. Methane was also emitted, and later subtracted by the formation of ‘natural gas’. When the earth was warmed by carbon dioxide rainfall increased in some areas causing the expansion of wetlands and thus the emission of methane. Also methane was probably emitted from permafrost, and in special cases from sub-marine frozen methane or clathrates. Other causes of temperature change such as sun cycles, changes in mountain building, continental drift due to plate tectonics, and polar wandering, contributed to climatic changes along with changes in sun-earth geometry and the greenhouse gases. Probably different causes were dominant at different times, at different scales and at different places over the Earth.


Isn't is remarkable that when the sea level rose 120 metres since the depths of the last ice age, that it stopped just where our magnificient beaches are. 

(geological humour!) 

The graphs below from Gregory Retallack (2002) are one example of the detailed work being done on climate history. The graph of the left shows oceanic temperatures based on oxygen isotope ratios in fossil shells going back 300 million years to the Permian Period. Cooling is to the left. The graph on the right is based on the density of stomatal (pore) openings in fossil leaves. When the carbon dioxide concentration is high, the number of openings required to take in the gas is less. A correlation can be observed here, but see below.

 Temperature and Carbon Dioxide, Permian to Present

The next two graphs show exactly what correlation is observed above. The graph on the right shows that the correlation between the concentration and the temperature is observable but rather poor. The graph on the left hits home. Here, the peak ages for temperature and CO2 are plotted, showing clearly that although the absolute amounts are all over the place, the time when each peaked was spot on.


Tertiary correlation of CO2 and Temperature

The following diagram covering 600 million years from Dana Royer and team (2004) shows better how the science of palaeoclimatology works. It is best to look first at Part C on the diagram that shows the well established geological evidence for past widespread glaciation (dark blue) and cool periods (light blue). Researcher Shaviv (2002) produced evidence that cosmic radiation (Part B) could be partly correlated with at least the dark blue times, but with serious miscorrelations also. Shaviv and Veiser (2003) produced further evidence that, using oxygen isotope analysis, palaeotemperatures (blue line in Part A) were well correlated with cosmic rays. Royer et al, puzzled by this result, noting the weak correlation with the glaciation evidence, reevaluated the oxygen isotope data. They found that if the pH of the oceans was taken into account (red, black lines and orange band in Part A) then the same peaks and troughs remained, but were better correlated with the glaciation evidence. For example, the temperature trough at 440 Myears was slighter than the one at 300 My (Ma). This shows that oxygen isotopes corrected for pH are a reliable temperature indicator and that temperature is not as well correlated with cosmic rays as once thought. This doesn't however show that cosmic rays are irrelvant, but studies of cosmic rays over the last two decades have not shown any correlation with temperature.

Oxygen isotope temperature corrected for pH

Now, while other causes are changing only very slowly if at all, we are playing with the natural earth cycle of sedimentation, subsidence, subduction and volcanism, taking the buried fossil fuels and limestone and creating our own volcanoes in the form of a techno-economic process, starting from mines and petroleum wells to energy and cement processors and vehicles, and just beginning to understand what we are doing. Apart from the irregularity of the 'global warming', severe climate change of various types from longer droughts to forest fires is beyond dispute. The alternative hypothesis that the sun rather than GHGs is causing contemporary warming has been studied and found to have little support. Oceanic oscillation is likely to account for the 1-4 year oscillations in global temperature. That temperature change has natural influences in no way prevents humans from adding to any upward trend that could exist at times and worsening it to global disaster level. It is feedback, tipping points and irreversibility that the sceptics-deniers do not usually address. Basically it does not matter whether the present warming is partly natural or totally human induced, we must try to stop it before it destroys us.


James Hansen's explanation of the PETM peak in the Tertiary Period is covered in the main home page.




Retallack G. J. 2002. Carbon dioxide and climate over the past 300 Myr. Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society London A Vol.360, pp 659-673.


Royer D.L. et al, 2004. CO2 as a primary driver of Phanerozoic Climate. GSA Today, Vol 14 No. 3 March 2004. Geological Society of America



  Copyright © 2009 Michael Tuckson.  All Rights Reserved 


 Print this page  |   Bookmark this page


Language Links Above




Các chiến lược mới để làm giảm nhẹ sự thay đổi khí hậu      

Semi-Random Slogans

Invite a denier to lunch

Eat less meat every day

Form a small climate group

Inertia will kill us, twice

Holiday on bicycles

Learn how to plant and nurture trees

Drain your rice fields sometimes 

Auction caps 

Grow and store carbon 

Write to a newspaper in a denier region 

Help the employees, not the fossil fuel owners

Read a book, not a newspaper, on the bus

350 not 450

Study tropical forest protection

Why are most deniers men?

Carbon tax before cap and trade

Look for a home closer to work

Write a new page for this website

Oppose lobbying

Put a new slogan on your bicycle or bag every day 

Study the latest climate science first

No air-conditioning before lunchtime

Drink just a little cow milk

Study Earth's thermal inertia

Learn how to teach

Send parts of this website to a politician

Grow and store carbon in houses 

Organize exchanges with Asian universities 

Grow crops not livestock

Rationing is equitable

Study thermal inertia in buildings

Practice dialogue, not argument

Behaviour before technology

Make a bicycle path plan

Don't use concrete

Drive a much smaller car

Study the denier claims

1.5 not 2.0

Don't use trees for offsets

Work with a bilingual person 

Eat even less meat every day

Support better democracy

Do deniers care for their grandchildren? 

Paint your roof white

Oppose advertising by polluting companies

Consume less, save money

Form an international group 

Help a politician to learn

Making cement emits CO2.

Education must be global 

Grow and store carbon in the soil

Fans, not air-conditioning

Lobbying is bribery

Study growing algae

Improve the school curricula

You can't read driving a car

Find dated photos of glaciers

Study which companies bribe political parties 

How do you entice a denier to want to learn?

Share your job with an oil driller

Plant trees to absorb carbon dioxide already in the atmosphere

Have you tried Tahini dip?

What do deniers understand?

Dress less formally in the heat

Design a more tempting commuter bus

Get to know a denier's children

Pay tax to fund retraining

Less clothing, not fans

Eat kangaroo meat 


Improve the university curricula

One is enough

Interview a climate scientist on video

Insulate your home

Open a wind turbine factory in a coal town

Study Earth feedback processes

300 not 350

Wheat is safer than rice

Take men's fashions up, and women's down

Use a condom in emergencies

Share some job-time

Protest forest destruction

Wear a cotton coat

Study tree plantations

Eat just a little cheese

Get to know a denier's grandchildren

Why do the rich want to grow?

Put on an extra jumper when its cold outside

Offer a new job to a coal miner

Adopt two

Join an NGO today

Political bribes, not donations

None is enough

Holiday close to home

Invest in a diverse plantation

Wear less in the heat

Talk to migrants about emailing home

Make compost

Promote eco-tourism for locals

Read more of this website

Ask a politician have they read James Hansen

Eat less cream

Jumpers are cheaper than gas

Arrange a climate debate

Build a thick-walled house

Study how to turn moderate deniers

Study fast growing trees

Hand out appropriate leaflets at railway stations

Study your local energy organization

Learn about the delights of veganism

Study Chinese

Practice walking

Shirts are enough in hot weather

Support rapid research on how to turn deniers

Try an IUD

Asians make blankets from cotton and kapok

Get to know your neighbours

Recycle jumpers and coats

Holiday by mass land transport

Drink red wine, not milk

Support rapid research on capturing CO2 from the air.

Hand out leaflets at bus stops

Men's legs are beautiful too

Talk to local government about recycling biological waste

Keep a stock of morning after pills


Adopt another one

When will the USA go metric?

Write and publish leaflets

Holiday on a sailing ship

Start a course on climate change and solutions

Exercise periodically when its cold

Farmers now support the Green party

Give a talk at the local school

Chocolate's great with soya cream

Climate crisis not climate change

Share a car with your neighbours

Study tipping points and irreversibility

Email government ministers

Form a climate group with your neighbours or friends

Read Climate Cover-Up

Study palaeo-climatology

Soon meat becomes less tempting

Improve your foreign language skills

Adopt a baby girl 

Write an article for your local newspaper

Read Storms of My Grandchildren (after reading some climate science such as on this website)

Take plastic packaging off at the shop

Climate emergency not climate crisis

Ask you government to make a good video on the climate emergency

Move your company to where your workers live

Invite your favourite denier to a vegan lunch

Ask the supermarket to turn off half the lights

Study carbon taxes in more than one nation

Join yours with other climate groups

Shop at dimly lit shops

Email people you know abroad

Ask a climatologist to explain the various! meanings of CO2e

Plant and nurture trees in your garden till its full

Learn about biochar

Study the bus routes in your town or city

Support James Hansen for the Nobel Prize for physics, peace or whatever.

Protest new oil exploration

Install a solar thermal hot water heater

Shop for food where the fridges have lids or doors

Plant 10 trees a month in neighbours' gardens and in parks

Ask your adult children what they think

Write a better letter to the newspapers

Organize a demonstration outside coal company offices.

Where are the Nobel prizes for Earth and social sciences?

Form a climate group at work

Give a talk at a school in a coal town

No children is best

Buy a glass of wine for a denier

Start an NGO

Support honest and intelligent politicians

Study short-term GHGs

Join a good political party

Give a talk at a school at an oil town

Study hire-purchase for solar panels

Stake out a coal energy factory

Don't export coal or oil

Work in a vulnerable area

Invest in geothermal

Live with a farmer family in the holidays and help them plant trees

Build a sailing ship

Give talks at the local town.

Hand out leaflets at another station

Video a debate

Move to a swinging seat in time for close elections



















 Michael Tuckson

The website author and publisher, December 2009.


Easy Summary


We must try to understand up-to-date climate science coming out over the last few years that warns of possible disaster. Ice shelves and sheets are melting much faster than before. Global temperatures are rising, with oscillations due to ocean oscillations. Natural causes are minor compared with pollution. This understanding must be spread by advanced adult education, especially among the powerful. As many readers as possible must spread understanding.


Denier leaders are funded by the fossil fuel, tobacco and similar corporations and/or are ideologues. Their arguments are always against, not considering pro and con, as with real science. They rarely call for better understanding, just attempt to confuse. None are climate scientists. Their motivation is salary and weak government, not salary and discovery. Either they do not care about their descendants or they do not understand the probable future.


We must put more emphasis on the short-term greenhouse influences such as methane. Carbon dixide must be captured from the atmosphere. Also we must lead with behaviour change before appropriate technology spreads. Birth control is important in some regions. Job-time sharing and retraining can reduce any unemployment resulting from mitigation measures. Mitigation must be coordinated globally by government and citizens in modern sectors. City pairing could be useful.